Title

A Bibliography of the Research in Tissue Culture, 1884–1950

Author

By Margaret R. Murray & Gertrude Kopech
Published by Academic Press, 1953
Two-Volume Set: Volume I (A–K), Volume II (L–Z)

Image

Spines of two blue volumes titled A Bibliography of the Research in Tissue Culture, 1884–1950

Description

This monumental two-volume reference index spans nearly 70 years of scientific exploration into tissue culture. Compiled at the dawn of the molecular era, it catalogs over 15,000 original articles and cross-references more than 86,000 indexed terms relating to the in vitro cultivation of living cells. From 19th-century sponge tissue studies to 20th-century cancer cell experiments, the work stands as a testament to the meticulous effort of two pioneering women in biomedical documentation.

Condition

Both volumes are clean, sturdy, and complete. Cloth covers remain richly colored with gold-embossed spines. Minor edge wear. Internal pages are crisp, with visible library stamps from Boston University School of Medicine. One endpaper contains a donor label dated November 16, 1956.

Gallery

Historical context

Prepared under the auspices of the Tissue Culture Commission (formed 1946), this index emerged from a postwar surge in medical research tied to cancer studies, cytogenetics, and virology. The compilers drew on materials across languages and nations, reflecting a global scientific effort. Before computers and keyword search, this kind of work was done by hand—and the result remains a marvel of bibliographic achievement.

Curious Facts, Ephemera, and Trivia

  • The bibliography excludes in vivo chamber experiments (e.g., rabbit’s ear, tadpole tail), focusing solely on in vitro cell survival and behavior.

  • The introduction admits to “ghost references” and tracing 5,500 mis-cited sources.

  • Murray and Kopech read 29,000 articles to compile this work.

  • The donation label confirms the book joined Boston’s medical school collection in 1956—likely funded through a formal alumni giving program.

Excerpt

“The undertaking which at its inception was expected to be a small one was found to have unforeseen ramifications, and has occupied in all more than five years.” — from the Introduction

Why it is in the Cabinet

This set doesn’t just catalog knowledge—it documents the obsessive, manual labor that kept science searchable in a pre-digital world. That it was compiled by two women scholars at Columbia in the 1940s and 50s makes it all the more remarkable. It’s a tribute to perseverance, precision, and the uncredited backbone of early biomedical progress.

Support Dr. Bebout’s Cabinet of Medical Curiosities

If you enjoy the history, the oddities, and the effort, help keep this cabinet open. Every little bit helps preserve and share the strange wonders of medicine's past.

Buy Me a Ko-fi ☕ Buy Me a Coffee ☕ Tip via PayPal 💵

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top